It sure explains a lot. Roger Pielke Jr points out that the NY Times thinks climate change reporting should be advocacy.
For them's among us what care about facts and the like this is NO surprise.
But wow - to encourage a whole bunch of people not to take your newspaper seriously at all?!
Both advocacy and journalism are fundamental to a healthy democracy, but when they are mixed together, especially on the news pages of the NYT, neither is served particularly well. Please count me among those who prefers to get news from plain vanilla journalism, not the yellow kind.
It amazes me that the self-styled newspaper of record is so ready to give up the ghost and let this so-called reporter embarrass himself.